0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I want one because of this photo. (Attachment Link) Tom L.Wellington CO
Well, and to the consternation of many here, I will take IM's side, as I do with most mfgs.First, years ago at train shows, Frank was, well, frank, with industry data especially IM's production runs. I always appreciated that, just because of my interest in the hobby. He relayed that at that time (maybe 2005, will have to find my document on that) that they had sold about 250,000 covered hoppers in BOTH N and HO, for instance. However, a car like their much anticipated modern flat sold only about 8,000 in N. Not sure if they had more than one re-run of those flats, but they were another much needed modern car that IM produced. If you figure out the then $26(?) MSRP price tag and figure IM only grossed 45% of that, the total project gave them less than 100K. Profit on that? Who knows but even $20,000 for a year of work doesn't seem like a lot to me.I still talk to them (Frank and Frank, Jr) when I get a chance. I told them that I am part of the problem - not really pre-ordering much, but with that new covered hopper (wonder if that will sell more like the flats or grain covered hoppers? Probably the former) and their announced GP 10, I would actually be in for several and a few locos. My goal was to add a few unofficial pre-orders to get them to commit. Obviously, LOL, they didn't take me at my word. Actually, the whole experience of hearing their honest reaction (not enough pre-orders, especially for the GP 10 in certain road names, and they intimated it was nowhere close to the 300 minimum they wanted per road) made me start pre-ordering more. Knowing that every year it does seem harder to get certain stuff without pre-order (i.e. recent MT TBox 60 ft boxcars) keeps me pre-ordering.As someone here said, and I agree, right now I switch my cement plant with some earlier era short covered hoppers and it really doesn't bother me, even if I would have bought a dozen to make my RR look a bit more like the 2000+ era I envisioned. Similarly, as a large switching layout representing an urban branch/spur to an industrial park, I like the look of second hand locos, leased patch jobs, etc. The GP 10's would have been a nice addition (and their sound SD40-2's have been great for me) That said, I have enough locos to run already, and the variety of locos, which I really do love, seems to get less and less "necessary" as time goes on.I refuse to angry up my retirement years over not having "necessary" locos and cars (although, admittedly, between building 4 N scale layouts over 30 years focusing on both terminal roads that could run everything or branch lines that can run almost anything reasonably construed as second hand, I have formed my layouts around NOT getting every loco of every road) in my quest for the perfect N scale layout. Hey, I'm not anywhere close to it being perfect in other areas I can control, so I won't blame mfgs or anyone else for that!As time goes on, I realize that I could probably run the same stuff every time, and not care. And, in fact, I do. My Kato SD40-2 (modified and painted to be an IHB SD38-2) still runs the best, so I use it most. My second best runners are scale trains C-39-8, so I run those next. Most nights, I just leave what is on the track on the track. Similarly, with rolling stock, I have enough to rotate out so the same boxcar doesn't go to the same spur every time. My original plan was to rotate some rolling stock out every session, but I don't even do that very often. With six distinct switch jobs, I rarely think about the sameness by the time I get back around to the same job.Bottom line, bitching about mfgs seems to be more important on social media than in actually enjoying model railroading, isn't it?
(PS John... how about them Kawasaki bi-levels? That stimulus check we are getting won't spend itself lol)
I've lost faith in IM as well... I have a few of the 4750 covered hoppers.... but between-Releasing products that while detailed, look poorly assembled (SD40-2s)-Announcing products with 1 scheme and releasing them in another (Conrail ACF Hoppers)-Multi year lead times to production.-Announcing Vaporware that still waits for reservations... while another mfg announced, released, and a 2nd run of the same model (4785s) I'm done.. it something shows up in physical form that I want.. I may buy one.. otherwise.. nahh..
Looks like one of those self-fulfilling failures. Due to the company's past history modelers are shunning preorders, so the company doesn't get enough reservations to produce new models. Down the drain things go.
The Railwire is not your personal army.
Remember when these Intermountain threads were about the SD45-2. Pepperidge Farm remembers...