Author Topic: train length  (Read 5471 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

bbunge

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 249
  • Respect: +330
Re: train length
« Reply #45 on: December 14, 2020, 11:09:11 AM »
0
file this under "there is a prototype for everything" or a Rule 34 if you will.

the Super C was a commerical failure - the added $1400 (in the 1960's!) was just too much to be a viable long term offering.  sure they ran trains with as few as one car, but on average, it was 15-20 cars.  it's a hot shot service with exactly a single daily train, the rest of the traffic was "normal" sized.  modeling a drag freight on a bridge line with 4 cars... that's not gonna look "right" to many.


From what I have seen, that Super C approach is basically what today is know as PSR (Precision Scheduled Railroading) except it's done with just about everything, just not one train.  At least the way CSX has put it into play you can now basically see two trains combined with the 2nd train's locomotives running as DPUs when they are scheduled to leave at the same time and can make the line/grade.

I don't model operations.  But for those who model operations in a modern environment, are you modeling PSR?  By my last count, CSX, UP and NS are all running PSR.

Bob

Bob

R L Smith

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 713
  • Respect: +613
Re: train length
« Reply #46 on: December 14, 2020, 12:46:19 PM »
0

A GP7 is rated at 1500 HP, just like the F7.

My bad.  It's the RS-3 that was rated at 1600 hp.   :facepalm:
ELHS and NMRA member

If the women don't find you handsome, make sure they find you handy...

John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13472
  • Respect: +3349
Re: train length
« Reply #47 on: December 14, 2020, 05:21:17 PM »
+1

I don't model operations.  But for those who model operations in a modern environment, are you modeling PSR?  By my last count, CSX, UP and NS are all running PSR.


The last time I did operations on my layout it was a disaster --- just like the real world :)

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11813
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +7216
Re: train length
« Reply #48 on: December 14, 2020, 08:39:57 PM »
0
The last time I did operations on my layout it was a disaster --- just like the real world :)

Reminds me of that time that Ed K. was operating on Bernie Kempinski’s O scale layout.  :trollface:

DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 33356
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5562
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: train length
« Reply #49 on: December 14, 2020, 08:48:19 PM »
0
Reminds me of that time that Ed K. was operating on Bernie Kempinski’s O scale layout.  :trollface:

DFF

How can *ANYONE* mess up operations with 0 scale equipment?
. . . 42 . . .

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11813
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +7216
Re: train length
« Reply #50 on: December 14, 2020, 09:16:20 PM »
0
How can *ANYONE* mess up operations with 0 scale equipment?

Paging @Ed Kapuscinski.   :D

DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!