0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Hmm. If it matters, the 'G' in the 0404 RGB chip I'm using (Rohm) is already 527nm. That's signal green, no blue necessary. That's why I thought the back-to-back R/G 0402 chips instead would be a reasonable solution. :shouldershrug:
Well, yes and no. The back-to-back R/G pair is still supported by some off-the-shelf signal drivers such as the Digitrax SE8C. And it's easy enough to do with a PIC if you were needing something fed by discrete one-per-color logic.I'm thinking that some of the magic of yellow is more in strobing the primary colors to fool the eye rather than hoping to get a solid color mix in something translucent. The trick may be in frequency and duration. Time to do a bit of research.EDIT: Quick surfing resulted in discussions of "convergence". A RGB source like a monitor produces a perceived wide gamut because the individual color pixels are too small to be seen as separate elements. The RGB chips or separate R/G pairs are large enough for each color source to be perceived separately. We can try to blur the sources with translucent conduits and artificially inducing convergence, but at some angles the separate colors remain perceptible. This was always my problem with the old-school R/G bi-polar LEDs.If I hit a wall on the R-Y-G thing I'm working on right now, maybe I can resurrect the signal driver test rig I built around a BASIC II. It had a nice PWM function, so hooking that up to the original test signal might be good for tweaking into a yellow.
Are you actually planning to use the blue LED in the mix? Or just green and red? The only possible use I can see for blue is to get a better green hue.
Here are the results, a finished signal: [img]http://www.everywherewest.com/SM_SA_red.jpg[/img