Author Topic: Is the U28C Hornsby new announcement, or old?  (Read 2342 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Spikre

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 580
  • Respect: 0
Re: Is the U28C Hornsby new announcement, or old?
« Reply #15 on: June 15, 2015, 05:08:49 PM »
0
 :)
   NP and CB&Q got the Phase-1 U28C bodies because GE hadn't finished
  firming up the "NEW" bodies yet on both the B and C trucked units.
   they did start releasing the Phase-2 U28Cs about 7/66,think L&N got
  the 1st order on ADK FB-3 trucks.
   GE revamped both lines,and that led to years of the "Pug" nosed units
   being produced.
   think the B trucked units came 1st with GE 301-304 ,U30B Demos being
   its 1st New bodied units about 6/66.
   later they were Up-Graded to U33Bs,then U36Bs.
   but when sold eventually they were rebuilt back to U30Bs.
   maybe CB&Q and NP wanted units "NOW" and didn't want to wait for the
  new bodied units ?
         Spikre
          :?
   

nkalanaga

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 10023
  • Respect: +1527
Re: Is the U28C Hornsby new announcement, or old?
« Reply #16 on: June 16, 2015, 02:13:11 AM »
0
Spikre:  I don't know about the CB&Q.  "Northern Pacific Diesel Era" by Lorenz Schrenk specifically states that the NP wanted the U25 bodies for its U28Cs, so it apparently wasn't that they were in a hurry.

The book says, discussing the bids received, that the competition was the C630, which the NP refused because they didn't want Alcos, and the SD45, which the rejected because it wasn't in production yet.  Then it says that "General Electric offered an improved U28C design based on the U25C.  In addition, in order to reduce maintenance costs, GE offered to custom-build the units for the NP with the same body dimensions and configuration as the earlier U25C's that the road already possessed.GE had already provided similarly customized U28C's for the CB&Q."  Earlier, in the U25C section, he noted that NP was impressed by the low maintenance costs of the U25C.

The author also says that NP didn't like EMD's wheel slip control, claiming it didn't work as well as GE's.  Oddly, the GN preferred EMDs to GEs, judging by the numbers purchased.  Obviously, even if they were owned by the same group, and planning to merge, they had very different tastes in locomotives.
N Kalanaga
Be well