Author Topic: Beaumont TX Harbor Island Track Plan Discussion  (Read 1788 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3540
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +751
Re: Beaumont TX Harbor Island Track Plan Discussion
« Reply #15 on: September 30, 2024, 04:23:09 PM »
0
This looks like a great theme.   One comment is that I don't see how you use the elevator tracks given the short length in front of the elevator.   Maybe some revision in there will help operations.

Thanks, @Scottl. Those grain yard tracks will run another 8-10 feet along that wall. I was running up against the 50 object limit in Anyrail. Evidently my old cronky Win 10 laptop isn't recognizing I bought a copy of it 10-12 years ago.

Not sure I want the switching job of pulling short cuts of hoppers to drag through the unloading shed and then shuffle back into the yard, but the real elevator does exactly that, just with 2-3 engines at one time. Old SW units of some type too, so very model friendly for N scale. And they'll add some motive power variety to the layout, which is a design given and druther. Trans Global Solutions uses everything here from GP38-2s to CF-7s, though I think the latter have been retired as I don't see them in more recent videos on YouTube. Plus their paint scheme is a nice airbrush friendly dark blue.  I'll have none of that Conrail blue shade on my layout, @Ed Kapuscinski.   :D

Peter Pfotenhauer

Scottl

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4843
  • Respect: +1515
Re: Beaumont TX Harbor Island Track Plan Discussion
« Reply #16 on: September 30, 2024, 06:06:46 PM »
0
Ah, gotcha.  That sounds good to me.

Just for laughs and inspiration, I drove by this today in Lethbridge, Alberta and thought of your layout.  This little scene with the grain elevators and some other industry jammed into a small area was very modeller-friendly:  https://maps.app.goo.gl/GKatGnsuxivn8wRm6


basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3540
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +751
Re: Beaumont TX Harbor Island Track Plan Discussion
« Reply #17 on: October 01, 2024, 12:31:42 AM »
0
Ah, gotcha.  That sounds good to me.

Just for laughs and inspiration, I drove by this today in Lethbridge, Alberta and thought of your layout.  This little scene with the grain elevators and some other industry jammed into a small area was very modeller-friendly:  https://maps.app.goo.gl/GKatGnsuxivn8wRm6

Indeed it is a Mindheim friendly prototype area, but I don't think I can fit the Lethbridge Viaduct in my basement, even in N scale.  :D
Peter Pfotenhauer

Scottl

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4843
  • Respect: +1515
Re: Beaumont TX Harbor Island Track Plan Discussion
« Reply #18 on: October 01, 2024, 09:30:07 AM »
0
Can't slip anything past you, lol

basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3540
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +751
Re: Beaumont TX Harbor Island Track Plan Discussion
« Reply #19 on: October 05, 2024, 03:59:38 AM »
0
Can't slip anything past you, lol

Well, not something that large.  I went back and read your layout engineering post about a possible Vancouver harbor based layout. I won't be doing a helix for sure, but a lot of the ideas kicked around in there have helped with decision making for these plans.

Pretty sure I'll have to fill my need for mountain scenery by looking at your photos of the new CP layout you have going. It's spectacular.
Peter Pfotenhauer

basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3540
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +751
Re: Beaumont TX Harbor Island Track Plan Discussion
« Reply #20 on: October 07, 2024, 02:18:53 AM »
0
Updated basic track plan to better facilitate yard ladders for the docks and grain elevator.

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

This better matches the prototype flow and arrangement by the transfer sheds, but creates a potential problem for the grain elevator yard (Dreyfus Yard). I have to have a 3 or 4 foot long lift out or swing gate here to allow use of the sliding glass door to the back yard. Am I asking for trouble by trying to run 5 or 6 tracks across the gaps? I can cut it down to 2, although that will affect yard capacity somewhat, but better that than a constant maintenance headache on an essential location for operation.
Peter Pfotenhauer